However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 11, 2016, from around 18:10 to 18:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) took a bath in front of the C hotel located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City; (b) in front of the E-si operated by the victim D without any justifiable reason to stop the taxi and dance in front of the taxi; and (c) the victim “hump sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp s

2. The Defendant damaged property by blocking E-si operated by the victim D without any reason at the time, place, and without a reason, and attached a studio on the roof of the taxi and caused a studio to the front roof of the taxi, thereby damaging the part on the roof of the victim’s taxi to be repaired by the repair cost.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, and the Defendant, as set forth in paragraph (2), committed assault against the victim by putting the victim on the roof above the driver’s seat of the cab driving 58 years old, putting the victim away from the taxi, putting the victim under the bath “Choe kyp” on the cab, putting the victim away from the taxi, walking the victim’s scrof by scrof, arms, arms, etc., and continuing to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Damage photographs;

1. A report on investigation (booms analysis);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph by filing an investigation report (a photograph by cutting a black stuff) and by cutting a black stuff;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent offenders, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50(1) of the Criminal Act is advantageous to the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.