대여금
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 260,000,000 and the interest rate thereon from March 13, 2015 to the date of full payment.
1. In addition to the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number of branch numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff is acknowledged as borrowing 3.8% monthly interest rate of 3.8% from January 30, 2008 to January 9, 2009 (the evidence Nos. 1 and 2). However, at the time, the plaintiff borrowed an apartment house owned by the plaintiff as security or borrowed it to the defendants, and at the time, the interest rate of the secured loan was 4-5% per annum, and the credit loan interest rate was 7-8% per annum. 3.8% per annum, the interest rate stated in the above loan certificate seems to be 3.8% per annum as stated below, on the premise that the plaintiff loaned it to the defendants, and the defendants were 300,000,000 won, 300,000 won, 300,000 won, 1.5 billion won, 208.
According to the order of 10,00,000 on January 30, 2008; 6.30,000 on August 20, 2008; 6.30,000,000 on August 31, 2008; 7,000 on October 8, 200, 200 on March 16, 2008; 30,000 on April 16, 2008; 4.0,000,000 on April 16, 20, 200 on the above 30,000,000,000 on May 30, 200, 2008, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff the above 10,000,000 won on May 30, 200,000 on the loan, 1005,008.
2. As to the determination of the Defendants’ assertion, the Defendants asserted that the Defendants repaid a total of KRW 19,4850,000 over 60 times from March 4, 2008 to April 5, 2010, and thus, the Defendants were able to do so.