However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 28, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on November 13, 2006, the same court received a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for the same crime.

On June 1, 2020, at around 22:23, the Defendant driven Csch Rexroth car at a section of about 100 meters, while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.142% on the front of Dongducheon-si B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Statement on the situation of the D traffic accident (Ma2), vehicle photograph, etc. related to the accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc. inquiry reports (A);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act committed the instant crime even though the Defendant had been punished for drunk driving in 2006 and 2014.

The blood alcohol concentration (0.142%) of this case is high.

However, the punishment as ordered is determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the defendant's perception of the crime and reflects his mistake; (b) there are other circumstances that may be somewhat different from the circumstances of the drinking driving of this case; (c) the distance of drinking driving (100 meters); (d) the background of the control; (d) the age and character of the defendant; (e) his age and character; (e) family relationship; (e) the motive