The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendants guilty of the instant facts charged (except for the portion without charge).

As alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the degree of proof required in a criminal trial, thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the principle of specification of facts charged, the principle of trial on evidence, and the presumption of innocence, or by omitting,

The Defendants’ final appeal is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.