If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On August 16, 2010, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would work as an employee from the Eda that is operated by the victim after this mold, from the victim D (Nam, 66 years of age) to the Cda in the Cda located in Si, 10:00 on August 16, 2010.”

However, even if the defendant received a prepaid payment, he did not intend to work as an employee in the above Eda.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 3,50,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of remittance certificates or notarial Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;