beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.05.23 2019고단343

야간건조물침입절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, around 03:00 on January 6, 2019, committed the crime against the victim B, opened a back door on the side of the restaurant, which was not corrected, and intruded into the restaurant, and stolen the cash of KRW 430,000,00 in cash owned by the victim B, the owner of the restaurant business, who was kept in the depository located in the said restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by others at night, and stolen the victim's property.

2. On January 18, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E, committed a theft of KRW 200,000,000 in cash owned by the victim E, the principal owner of the above restaurant business, which was kept in custody of the above restaurant, by intrusion into the above restaurant through the window that was not corrected in the “G” restaurant located in Seo-jin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was located in F.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by others at night, and stolen the victim's property.

3. At around 04:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) opened a toilet window in front of the “J” located in Seojin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I; and (b) invaded into the said gate, thereby thefting KRW 40,000 in cash owned by the victim H, a business owner of the said gate, from the cash receipt machine.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by others at night, and stolen the victim's property.

4. From January 18, 2019 to around 04:35, 05:47, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim K was committed in the “M” restaurant operated by the Victim K, which had been operated by the Jeonjin-gu L in Jeonjin-gu, Seoul, and tried to open the window outside of the toilets, and attempted to intrude into the above restaurant, but the space was not small and medium.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd another person's structure that was managed by him to steal another's property, and tried to steals another's property, but failed to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of each victim under E, H, K, and B;

1.Each.