A. The Plaintiffs concluded a service contract with Defendant G Co., Ltd. operated by Defendant I, and agreed to participate in the planning and work of the broadcast J program ( from K to February 17, 2015, hereinafter “instant program”) produced by Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant program”).

B. The Plaintiffs participated in the production and planning of the instant program, and the actual program of the instant program was broadcasted 24 minutes prior to the previous program, but the service costs that the Plaintiffs were not paid are as follows:

Plaintiff

The fact that: (a) the planning cost of KRW 12,00,000 for KRW 12,200,000 for the Plaintiff’s 3rd installment of KRW 1,200,000 for the planning cost of KRW 1,20,000 for the Plaintiff’s 7rd installment of KRW 950,000 for the Plaintiff’s 3rd installment of KRW 500,000 for the planning cost of KRW 500,000 for the Plaintiff’s 500,000 for the planning cost of KRW 500,000 for the Plaintiff’s 3rd installment of KRW 50,000 for the planning cost of KRW 50,000 for the Plaintiff’s 50,000 for the Plaintiff’s 3rd installment of KRW 300,000 for the E fee of KRW 300,000 for the small portion of KRW 1,219,00 for the Plaintiff’s 1,000 for each disputing

2. According to the above facts of determination, Defendant G, as a performance of the obligation to pay each service price to the Plaintiffs, is obligated to pay the amount written in the column for total amount unpaid in the above table and damages for delay from September 29, 2016, which is the day following the day of service of a copy of the complaint of this case (the Plaintiff claimed from February 18, 2015, the day following the last broadcasting day, but there is no assertion or proof as to the time limit for payment of the service price) by the Defendant’s defense as to the existence and scope of the obligation to pay the service price by the date of this decision, which is 5% per annum under the Civil Act until September 26, 2017 and damages for delay calculated by 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day until the day of full payment.

The plaintiffs are already unable to pay their wages to the plaintiffs because they are in excess of their obligations.