If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 26, 2018, at around 03:00, the Defendant sustained an injury, such as a complete escape that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim, while the victim D(58 years of age) was in dispute with the victim because it was not good between the Defendant and E, and the victim was in dispute with the victim, the victim was in dispute with the victim. On the other hand, the victim was in dispute with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant's livelihood is difficult for the reason of sentencing the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order, the crime committed in the judgment is contingent, and the defendant's argument is not attributable to the defendant's act. However, according to the records, the defendant's injury to the victim and witness E is consistently stated as a result of the defendant's act, and the victim has no reason to classify the defendant who is not E as a character, the facts charged in the instant case can be found guilty. The defendant's assertion is without merit.