If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The criminal defendant is a person who jointly operates D and the above company as a director of C in-house company.

On January 2016, the Defendant, directly or in the form of ordering the head of the E division of the said D to the victim F. “When completing the subcontracted work ordered by us, she will pay the cost of construction after reviewing the quotation.”

“ makes a false statement to the effect that it is “....”

However, the defendant was proceeding with the above company

GLren business is not proper and due to a very difficult financial situation of the company, the wages and office operation expenses of the employees were not fully disbursed. Since the interior works of another workplace awarded by the company are rarely complete, there was no intention or ability to reduce the construction cost even if the victim completes the interior works.

Nevertheless, on January 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim complete H’s test work; and (c) did not pay KRW 3,410,000 for the construction cost; and (d) on March 5, 2016, the Defendant paid KRW 4,770,000 for the construction cost and had the victim complete the test work in Gangnam-gu I; and (b) had the victim complete the test work in Gangnam-gu I, and had the victim paid KRW 4,770,00 for the construction cost of KRW 8,180,000 for the total amount of

2. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, like the foregoing paragraph 1, led the VictimF to produce a separate steel scrap equivalent to KRW 650,000 in order to install at K Burial on February 18, 2016, but did not receive supply due to the lack of supply due to the failure to meet the standards for the distribution of the said steel scrap, and did not bring about an attempted attempt to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of right to defense based on evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court. This part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that this does not interfere with the Defendant’s right to defense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.