물품대금
1. The Defendant paid KRW 54,660,774 to the Plaintiff KRW 6% per annum from May 7, 2015 to October 23, 2015.
Comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with multi-level art goods for consignment from 2009 to the defendant, and the defendant among them, around August 7, 2013, confirmed that the amount payable until July 31, 2013 is KRW 27,397,047, and paid the above amount. Since then, the plaintiff additionally supplied the defendant with the goods equivalent to KRW 24,68,467 until December 31, 2014, and received KRW 22,828,00,000, while the defendant kept the goods equivalent to KRW 25,423,260 among the goods entrusted for sale by the plaintiff, it is recognized that the plaintiff did not return the goods even though the plaintiff requested the return of the goods.
According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the amount of 29,237,514 won (27,397,047 won 24,668,467 won - 22,828,00 won - 25,423,260 won in total and the amount of 54,660,774 won in the record that it is reasonable to dispute about the existence and scope of the above obligation from May 7, 2015 to October 23, 2015, which is the date of the decision of this case where it is recognized that it is reasonable for the defendant to dispute about the existence and scope of the above obligation, and from the next day to the day of full payment, the claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit.