If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

The Defendants are members of the “G organization” as the occupants of the F Apartment in Daegu-gu D and E, which is an organization composed of some of the above apartment residents. The victim H is the 102 Dong representatives of the above apartment, the victim I is the 103 Dong representatives of the above apartment, the victim J is the 105 Dong representatives, the victim J is the 105 Dong representatives, and the victim K is the head of the management office.

1. On February 1, 2012, at around 20:00, the Defendants made a printed paper stating that “the head of the management office, the representative I, H, and J, etc., made prior mothers and collusions in the construction contractor and L restaurant prior to the tender for the construction work (children’s Day).” On February 1, 2012, the Defendants posted the instant apartment on the wall wall of the front household elevator and on the bulletin board, and distributed it to the household mail.

However, there was no fact that the victims had engaged in collusion with the successful bidder at a restaurant around that time with respect to the water supply museum construction implemented around 201.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other, thereby impairing the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On February 7, 2012, the Defendants displayed the printed matters with the same content as that of paragraph 1 to unspecified apartment residents within the said F apartment, and obtained the signature seeking consent from the victims to express their corruption.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other, thereby impairing the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. Notices;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Attachment of the details of approval for cards, Ma statement by reference witnesses, and submission of Cash Receipt Data);

1. Articles 307 (2) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code are applicable.