A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below on the defendant is too unhued and unfair.

2. Taking into account the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant judgment, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the "each imprisonment choice" of the 3 conduct of the 5th sentence of the judgment below, ex officio, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, shall be added, and then "(for each crime except the crime of forging a signature and the crime of signing a signature)" shall be added.