If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person who uses “D” and “E” in Lone Star Program, and operates Lone Star Blobs (F).

On March 2016, the Defendant posted the title “G” on his own Sone Star Program and Brogs, “H x I x Paris National Srost School.”

When the Defendant takes lectures from May 23, 2016 to May 27, 2016 to the victims who reported and contacted the notice, the Defendant may receive a certificate of completion issued by Paris National Prist School.

A false statement was made.

However, I is not a Paris national school, but a certificate of completion issued after attending the course was not a certificate of French national certification.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had the victims receive a total of 22,00 tons (29,138,855 Won) over 11 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographics and deposit details by posting a letter on the Lone Star Program;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the "I" as stated in the judgment of the defendant (hereinafter "the school of this case") is a national school, and that a certificate of completion issued after attending the course in the judgment (hereinafter "the course of this case") is a national certification certificate, which is written to the effect that there was no intention to deceive the victims, and that there was no intention to commit fraud.

2. Determination

(a) The deception as a requirement for fraud is widely contrary to each other in the transactional relationship with property, and is against the good faith and good faith.