If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2016 Highest 1972] Defendant A committed an assault on July 9, 2016 on the ground that he/she would deliver things to his/her daily activities arrested as a separate assault case at D District District of the Sungnam Police Station D of the Sungnam Police Station D, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam Police Station D, Sungnam-gu, to deliver things to his/her own activities, and that he/she would not have access to the process of the case, and that he/she would have access to the D District of the Sungnam Police Station D of the Sungnam Police Station, Sungnam-nam, and that he/she would have access to the object during the process of the case, with the body of his/her body, and she would walk the F's bridge during the process of stopping and stopping it.

Accordingly, Defendant A interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of the case and the maintenance of public order.

[2016 Highest 2403 / Defendant B] On July 9, 2016, in the front of the D District District District of the Sungnam Police Station D Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the surrounding circumstances belonging to the said district group arrested Defendant H, who is the first executive of the said district, as a current offender of the crime of interference with the performance of his/her official duties, and then arrested Defendant B into the police station, whether Defendant B was forced to board the police station.

“To perform the bath theory,” and assaulted the chest of the above G three times in two grandchildren.

Accordingly, Defendant B interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the investigation of the case and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of the CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes to each crime;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants’ choice of punishment: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Du148, Apr. 1, 2006);

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act