When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 01:15 on May 10, 2014, the damage and damage of property: (b) plucked and plucked both rear gates of the Da SM5 vehicle parked by the victim C in the Young-gu B parking lot; (c) walked thenet and the door door of the vehicle several times; (d) boomed the driver’s seat bucker in front of the road; (d) bucked off thenet and the door section of the vehicle, etc. with the driver’s hand, thereby damaging the unfluored market value; and (d) plicked the victim E’s front seat fM5 vehicle parked in the above D vehicle; and (e) plucked the fluored fluor, pling it, etc. of the victim’s H C vehicle that was parked, and then plucked up the market price, such as plucking and pling it.

2. At around 01:30 on May 10, 2014, the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the damage and damage of property, such as the foregoing paragraph (1), by means of the Suwon-nam Police Station K District L, which was called upon 112 reports at the places specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) and called the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the damage and damage of property, such as the foregoing paragraph (1). The Defendant expressed the Defendant’s desire to “this spunch, spunch,” and assaulted the Defendant at one time to walk the spunch.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C, E, G, or L;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of each damaged vehicle (referred to 5,8,11,16,20 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 366 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's mistake in sentencing of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable to the provisional payment order.