beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.10.19 2016고단824

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a crime of violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and completed the execution of the sentence.

【Criminal Facts】

Around 01:00 on July 26, 2016, the Defendant was notified that, in the building of Leecheon-si, and the Defendant’s residential corridor in front of the Defendant’s residence, “it is difficult for residents to sleep by drinking alcohol and sound in the corridor,” he/she should do so by means of a slope E and a patrolman belonging to the D Zone of the Leecheon-gu Police Station, the Defendant called out after receiving 12 report.

Although the defendant was recommended from slope E to enter his residence several times, he was informed that he might be arrested as a crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties from slope E, such as scambling to slope E, scaming to the hand floor, scaming to the scam, and scambling to the scam, and scaming to the scam, he was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties.

During the process of arrest, the Defendant asked the victim F(28 years of age)'s left part of the back side of the back side of the back side of the back side where treatment for about one week was required to the victim.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of duties on 112 Report Processing and inflicted injury on the victim at the same time.

The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the Defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime. Thus, according to the records, it is recognized that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime, but in light of the developments leading up to each of the instant crimes, the method and method of the crime, the Defendant’s attitude before and after the instant crime, and the speech and behavior, etc., it cannot be viewed that the Defendant had a state of lacking the ability to discern things or make decisions