A. From October 25, 2013 to Plaintiff A, KRW 47,746,127, KRW 31,256,031, and each of them.

A. The relationship between the parties 1) the network D (Ear, hereinafter “the network”).

(2) On October 25, 2013, the Defendant is the owner of a restaurant in the first floor of the commercial building, and the Defendant is the owner of the restaurant in the first floor of the commercial building. The Plaintiff is the deceased’s spouse and the Plaintiff B are the deceased’s children.

B. Around October 2013, the Deceased’s death and the occurrence of an accident occurred. Around October 2013, the Deceased was employed by G, who is his/her father’s father, and participated in the construction of the second floor of the commercial building, thereby taking part in the construction of the said building. (2) On October 25, 2013, the Deceased was engaged in the work of deducting the glass from the glass belt located there with the Defendant at the entrance in the above commercial building near the commercial building around 08:10.

The Defendant laid the string of the glass in the state where the string of glass was set up on one side, and the deceased’s 10 string of the glass was covered at the same time by the telegraph of the deceased (not less than 5m in thickness, not less than 2m in width, not less than 3m in length) in which the string of glass was laid off.

(3) The Deceased complained of suffering from the instant accident. The Defendant started working on the first floor restaurant of the commercial building, and reported to 119 on the same day. At around 10:11 on the same day, the Deceased died due to chest damage, etc. at H Hospital around 10:38. C. The Defendant was indicted as a crime of occupational injury in connection with the instant accident, and the Defendant was sentenced to a verdict of conviction on October 19, 2015 from the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court (No. 2014Da1570) to the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court (No. 2015No3492), but the Daejeon District Court (No. 2015No492) dismissed the Defendant’s appeal on April 26, 2016 (the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed on April 2016).

The succeeding intervenor’s successor to the payment of the survivor pension shall constitute the instant accident.