Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On March 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:40 on March 28, 2014, at a general restaurant located in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, “D”, one person for daily eating and drinking, and the other person for daily eating and drinking. At first, the Defendant argued that the instant restaurant manager E paid the food value to the Defendant and returned home to the Defendant, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by interfering with the victim’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;