추심금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a creditor against C, and on January 10, 2018, the Plaintiff received the claim for the return of the lease deposit against C to the Defendant as the Daejeon District Court 2018TTT No. 50173, Jan. 10, 2018, and the above written decision reached the Defendant on January 29, 2018.
The defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff as the collection right holder the lease deposit of KRW 100 million and damages for delay.
2. Determination and conclusion by Gap et al. are insufficient to recognize that Eul has a claim for the return of a lease deposit against the defendant only with the descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
C It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim under the premise that C has the right to return the lease deposit against the defendant is without merit.