When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. At around 15:00 on August 18, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s civil petition treatment work by force between approximately 30 minutes by avoiding disturbances, i.e., the son D (54 years old) of the above collection team C, when the amount deposited in the Defendant’s future was collected due to the Defendant’s health insurance in arrears. However, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s civil petition treatment work by avoiding disturbances by force between approximately 30 minutes.

2. In around 16:00 on September 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the desire of the Victim F (53 Doese) E in the same place; (b) “Abstinously 30 minutes of a disturbance, such as opening, fraud, alteration of internal money, and Domine Domine Domine,” she obstructed the victim’s and other employees’ civil petition treatment work at the same place, including: (c) the Defendant committed a disturbance for about 30 minutes; and (d) the Defendant continued to make a public service center on the first floor with the first floor, “Abstin, Domine, Domine, and Domine Domine,” with the desire of “abstining 30 minutes of a disturbance by force of a total of 1-hour amount.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (the attachment of victim’s thrts’s and retail photographs) and photographs attached thereto;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (Selection of a punishment penalty);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;