공무집행방해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the court below (one hundred months of imprisonment and a fine of five hundred thousand won) is too unreasonable in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal.
2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and against his mistake, etc.
However, the Defendant has been punished by imprisonment, suspension of execution, and fine several times due to the same crime, and the Defendant committed the same kind of crime again in several months after having been sentenced to imprisonment for the crime of interference with business by committing the crime of interference with business. In full view of the Defendant’s age, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive, background, method, method, method and consequence of the crime, criminal record relation, circumstance before and after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.