건축물사용승인처분취소
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) and (b) of the judgment of the court of first instance (as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases where "Article 1-1 (a) and (b) (as seen in Sections 5 and 12)" are applied as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of
2. The part after repair “A. Maritime Planning Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Maritime Planning”)
(B) On December 18, 2008, the Defendant obtained a building permit from the Defendant to construct one unit of the Class II neighborhood living facilities with the size of the first underground floor and the third floor above the ground in Jung-gu, Seoul. On January 13, 2010, the Maritime Planning is a building (hereinafter “instant building”) with the construction permit granted from the Defendant on January 13, 2010, with respect to the said building permit, on the content of the existing building permit, with respect to the building building from the Defendant, by conducting the construction work (hereinafter “instant building”).
(B) The Defendant completed the construction and obtained the approval of the use on February 1, 2011 (hereinafter the Defendant’s approval of the use on February 1, 2011) is “instant disposition.”
(i) "";
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.