However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 31, 2016, the Defendant accepted a proposal to withdraw and deliver the money deposited in the Saemaul Treasury (C) deposit account in the name of the Defendant, which would enhance the credit rating of the Defendant by repeating cash deposit and withdrawal from the bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Defendant 1 directly withdraws the money deposited in the above Saemaul Bank account in the name of Defendant from 10:05 to 11:11 on the same day, or withdraws it after transferring it to one bank account in the name of Defendant to the one bank account in the name of Defendant, and then deliver it to the designated person in the name of Defendant 1, the Defendant may be deemed that the money deposited in the account in the name of Defendant 1 cannot be the amount of damage to the crime of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal act of the criminal

I think.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 12:25 on the same day without the intention or ability to make a loan to the victim D, made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant shall send money to repay the existing loan at low interest rate to the victim D” and received KRW 10 million from the damaged person to the above Saemaul Bank’s account in the name of the Defendant, and made a false statement to the victim E at around 13:36 on the same day, and received KRW 15 million from the damaged person to the same account. On around 14:00 on the same day, the Defendant made a false statement to the same effect to the victim F, and then transferred KRW 10 million from the damaged person to the same account. From around 14:08 on the same day, the Defendant continued to receive KRW 12 million from the same account to receive the victim G with the same intent and receive KRW 12 million from the same account in the name of the Defendant, and deposited the money directly in the account or directly deposited in the national bank in the name of the Defendant.