When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who has operated a school researcher called “B,” and the victim C was a person who has operated a school researcher called “D.”

On July 16, 2014, the Defendant would come into contact with the Institute of Education in the column of “D’s “A” advertisement posted by the victim on the Korean EconomicTV Internet website” that was posted by the victim at the French site on July 16, 2014.

The locked shall transmit comments to the effect that, as D and B, the absence of a local institute is not a local institute, such as D and B, and that if it takes off, the cause of study shall be the cause of study in Korea. On the same day, 12:19 of the same day, “D” advertisements posted by the injured person on the weekly Internet site, posted on the weekly Internet site, “D” column, “D” advertisement, which was operated for four months after studying abroad and operating for a period of four months.

B It should not be identified that the study D status is abroad, but it should be received after B's reputation.

Flausee

“Along with the comments made on “A”, the victim was openly insultingd.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;