The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, it is just that the court below reversed the judgment of innocence of the first instance court on the ground that the defendant's act does not constitute legitimate act or self-defense on the facts charged of the injury of this case, and there was no error by misapprehending the legal principles on legitimate act or self-defense.

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal may be filed on the ground that the amount of punishment is extremely unreasonable only for a case on which death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed. Thus, in this case where the defendant was sentenced to a minor punishment, the argument that the sentence is unreasonable due to the failure

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.