When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 18:50 on May 4, 2015, the Defendant was a person engaging in driving of Cstststuna car, and the Defendant continued to drive the road in front of the Cthuna car, which is 295, from the side of the Cthuna car, to the Cthune Center. Since there is a crosswalk where signal, etc. is installed, the Defendant: (a) confirmed whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to care well before the road; (b) on the part of the victim D (n, 47 years old) who walked on the left side of the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals; and (c) caused injury to the victim in need of medical treatment for about 10 weeks, by taking over the above part front of the above passenger vehicle, even though the Defendant neglected to drive the signal to the left side of the vehicle; and (d) neglected to perform the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle according to the traffic signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have received around 10 weeks from the rest of the victim who caused a traffic accident by violating the signal, while taking into account the following factors: although it is recognized that the defendant had no criminal records of the same kind; that the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance; that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; that the defendant is relatively old; that the defendant is relatively old; and that all other factors of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case are considered to be considered.