추가상병불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff received medical care benefits by July 24, 201, with the approval of the “satise salt satisfing, right satisfing,” due to occupational accidents that occurred on May 25, 201.
B. On September 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury or disease against the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of the additional injury or disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on September 26, 2013 on the ground that “The Plaintiff did not have any inspection of radiation from the stoke at the time of the first accident, and as a result of examining CT photographs at the time of the accident, there was no medical causal link because the stoke opinion was not observed.”
C. The Plaintiff filed a request for examination of the instant disposition, and the Defendant dismissed the request for examination on November 27, 2013 on the ground that “Additional Injury and Disease is determined as an individual chronic disease and there is no proximate causal relation with the disaster”.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1 to 3, Eul evidence 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff 25 tons of cargo loaded 25 tons of cargo, and shocked into the sloping sloping frame at a height of 3 meters during work.
Since there is a proximate causal relation between occupational accidents and additional injury and injury, the instant disposition is unlawful.
B. According to Article 49 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, in cases falling under any of “where medical care is necessary because an injury or disease already caused by an occupational accident is additionally discovered” (Article 1), or “where medical care is required due to a new disease caused by an injury or disease caused by an occupational accident” (Article 2(2)), an application for medical care benefits for an additional injury or disease may be filed.
According to the result of the medical record appraisal on the Korean Medical Association of this Court, the body of the Korea Medical Doctor Association of this Court "if the body of the body of the attachment of the pelpelle is transferred to the pelle and the body of the body of the body of the body of the attachment of the pelle and the body of the body of the body of the body of the pelle and the body