The defendant is a person who was the chairperson of the G apartment tenant.

1. On September 17, 2010, the Defendant posted a notice on the G apartment bulletin board of Geumcheon-gu, Busan, stating that “I wish to introduce 102 Dong 202 as an attorney-at-law and give advice to the representative who wants to know well, and that the attorney-at-law would not be absolutely aware of the surrounding issues at other places,” and that I would like to be attached to confidential information. However, on August 13, 2010, I would like to say that all of the others would be a resident who was not an individual litigation for 5 months only. I would like to go against the face-to-face agreement that I would know.” and “I would like to go without complying with the face-to-face agreement that I have to go through.”

However, in fact, the victim H brought a lawsuit on the part of the above apartment residents for the interest of the above apartment residents, and the victim appointed an attorney-at-law in consultation with the defendant by reporting the data of the attorney-at-law in the law firm, and the facts of the lawsuit were not confidential to the public, and it was false to state that the victim made a false statement to the purport that the victim should be kept confidential to the residents even though the victim did not make a false statement to the defendant or the residents, and that it was false to state that the victim is an individual lawsuit even though the victim did not have claimed to be a personal lawsuit from the time of filing the lawsuit.

As such, the Defendant undermined the honor of the victim by pointing out false facts.

2. On October 10, 2010, the Defendant, on the bulletin board of the said apartment, stated that “102 Dong 202 HC, 202, using the reserve fund for G apartment as an individual by making a false statement of the reserve fund for G apartment co-ownership site,” and that “it shall be used as an individual by making a false statement of the reserve fund to the attorney’s office.”