However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CFX116.

On June 9, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 20:15th day of the 20th day of the 2014, while driving the Trackdong Village in front of the Hacksan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, and driving along one-lane of the Gacri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim's death by the above occupational negligence due to the external shock of the cage cage cage at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning autopsys;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, the conditions of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant, such as the occurrence of an accident while the defendant was on an irregular driving, and the liability leading to the death of the victim is not less than that of the defendant, and the defendant's primary offender is the primary offender, and the victim's bereaved family members are not subject to the punishment of the defendant under a unanimous agreement between the defendant and the defendant, etc., the conditions of sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking into account various sentencing