Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On September 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 02:0, around 02:0, at the first floor of C Hospital C located in Sinsan-si B, committed assault against the victim D’s assault, and used again the documents in which the victim was the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statements;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A report on internal investigation (on-site conditions at the time of arrival), an investigation report (on-site photographs);

1. Application of the CDA-TV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant alleged that the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act constitutes a legitimate defense. However, according to the evidence above, the Defendant’s act is deemed to have the nature of an attack beyond the minimum degree of defense that can be recognized as a legitimate defense, since the Defendant’s act is deemed to have the nature of an attack beyond the minimum degree of defense that can be recognized as a legitimate defense. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.