2. The lower court determined that the Defendant was under the period of probation, taking into account the fact that the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes, the number of illegal employees, up to 12 persons, etc., and, on the other hand, determined the Defendant’s punishment by taking account of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant was fully aware of and divided into account the facts of the instant crimes, the fact that there was no history of punishment for the same type of crime as each of the instant crimes, and the fact

Comprehensively taking account of the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, since the sentencing of the lower court is not deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.