1. Intrusion on a structure, theft;

A. On December 14, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of December 14, 2016: (a) opened a gate at around 08:40 on December 14, 2016, which was managed by the victim D in Busan Northern-gu, and opened, opened, and intruded into the 4th floor broadcasting room of the said church; and (b) went in the west.

1700,000 won with a single camera and thefted it.

B. On December 18, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of December 18, 2016, at around 11:00 on December 18, 2016, opened a simplified escape room installed at the Busan Eastdong-gu F apartment construction site, Busan, and intrudes upon the entrance and exit of the entrance that was not corrected, and then cut out one part of the wall, where the market price of which is 60,000 won in cash owned by the victim, is unknown from the outside project of the victim G, which was suffering from the wall.

In addition, one's external speculative machine was put into his own external speculative machine and stolen it.

2. On December 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, the Defendant: (b) went to the “J” operated by the victim I in Busan Northern-gu; (c) went to the “J”; (d) opened a closed window without correction; and (d) intruded into the door; and (e) cut off the part of the victim’s 35,000 won in red-si, the sum of KRW 321,000,000, namely, KRW 321,000,000, in red-si, the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I and K;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of D and G;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (Influence of buildings), Article 329 of the Criminal Act (influence of buildings), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, and Article 330 of the Criminal Act (influence of buildings at night) concerning the crime;

2. The fact that the punishment of concurrent crimes was committed by a person who committed a crime due to the same kind of criminal records and the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the same Act, and it was not even until the time after the release, and the nature of the crime and the recovery of any particular damage