The “F” discovered E (F, 25 years of age) and operated by himself, stops the color booming vehicle and set a glass door to show the inside of the vehicle, and made a publicly obscene act by getting out of the driver’s seat and by using a self-debrising method with the string of the sexual flag above.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion that she had his/her father left his/her place of work and returned to his/her place of work, and had him/her feel pain due to absence due to scam and scam, leaving his/her vehicle stopped and confirmed his/her sexual organ without recognizing the fact that his/her windows are opened, and did not engage in any obscene act.

3. The witness E’s legal statement and E’s statement are admissible as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case.

E found, in this Court, a vehicle of the defendant standing in India, which was stopped by India, and the defendant's self-defense behavior was committed by the chief window who was opened after the passage of the vehicle.

The statements made by the police are also written in the same purport.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., E, a defendant's act of self-defense, when following the defendant's vehicle.

In light of the judgment and the fact that the vehicle number was confirmed and the stop was not deemed to have been reported. As such, the time during which E witnessed the Defendant’s appearance appears to have been excessive to several seconds, and ② even according to E’s statement, the Defendant reported the side on which he was living together, and did not appear to be the other person, and the Defendant was the Korea University Medical Center prior to about three months prior to the date of the occurrence of the instant case.