When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

A. From around 03:40 to 04:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed an intent to “A victim C (the 62-year-old, South) who is a security guard, is not opening the Defendant’s leakage or opening the entrance at the entrance at the seat of the B, and caused damage to its utility by getting off one of the market prices in favor of the security room for drinking.”

B. On the ground of the above paragraph A, as the 20-minute desire for 20 minutes, the reason of the above 'A' is to interfere with the work of preventing two security guards from rendering normal security services, such as C by force, as the security guards wished for 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of causing damage to property and the choice of fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;