When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 06:30 on August 10, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force by putting 1 hour and 20 minutes on the floor of the instant taxi in front of the Seo-gu Incheon apartment site, Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, by driving on the back seat of the D cab operated by the victim C (the age of 63) and driving on the back seat of the D cab and having arrived at the destination, but the victim was reported to the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the relative telephone investigation of subordinate subordinate staff of a suspect E);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act lies in recognizing and opposing the instant crime.

Defendant

It seems that 100,000 won was paid to the victim for the purpose of paying taxi charges and paying damages.

On the other hand, in light of the instant situation and the attitude of the act, the Defendant’s liability is not easy.

In addition, the sentencing conditions of the present case and the records, such as the defendant's age and criminal records, existing criminal records, relationship with victims, motive means of crime, results of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.