2. As the judgment of the court below, the facts that the defendant confessions and reflects the fact that the value of the stolen goods has not been relatively large through the crime of this case, etc., which are favorable to the defendant, are already reflected in the judgment of the court below, or such circumstances are deemed to have been sentenced to the minimum punishment for the crime of this case through discretionary mitigation. The defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case with a large number of criminal records identical to the crime of this case. In addition, taking into account the contents and circumstances of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation and family environment, the background and result of the crime of this case, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.