유류분반환
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The plaintiff (appointed party)'s primary claim is dismissed.
(b).
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the case as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance 10 - 8 - 11 - 11 - to 11 - to 20 - to 11 -
“B. As seen earlier, the aggregate amount of the property(A) which serves as the basis for calculating legal reserve of inheritance (A) is KRW 1,754,947,107 [i.e., the aggregate amount of KRW 771,936,50 in the value of real estate + KRW 983,010,60 in the aggregate of KRW 548,328,82 in cash donation to Defendant C (i.e., the aggregate of KRW 548,681,785 in the amount of cash donation to Defendant C). Meanwhile, even if Defendant B had performed an agreement on the legal reserve of inheritance of KRW 691,610 in the lawsuit of the deceased, KRW 4,40,00 in the amount of nursing expenses, KRW 1,301,180 in the amount of funeral expenses, and KRW 1,307,409,790 in the first instance judgment on the legal reserve of inheritance of the co-inheritors or the extent of the entitlement to legal reserve of inheritance.