On October 2010, the Defendant conspiredd to obtain loans from the financial institutions entrusted with D with loan-related business by introducing a person called "C" in the early 2010, using documents related to the employment of the financial institutions entrusted with the loan-related business, and only a lease contract for a house, to make false documents related to the employment and a false lease contract, and to submit them to the financial institutions for the lease of the house for workers.

D around October 2010, 2010, the fact at the office of the office of the public construction industry corporation in Jungcheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, that the defendant had not been employed as an employee at the public construction industry corporation, made false documents such as a certificate of employment, which entered the defendant as an employee of the public construction industry corporation, and Eul made a false income tax collection confirmation which entered the defendant as an employee of the public construction industry corporation.

The F agreed to receive a proposal from G to receive a reimbursement from G to fulfill the lessor’s role in a false lease contract, and H drafted a false apartment lease agreement, which entered into at the I brokerage office located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government as “A guaranteed deposit amount of KRW 80 million, lessor F, and lessee A.”

H In October 2010, 2010, after considering the Defendant to take the Defendant as the central branch office of the victim bank in the Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Young-si, the Defendant issued a false employment-related document and a false lease contract to the Defendant, and the Defendant applied for a loan of 55 million won to the employee in charge of loans in the name of the victimized bank by using false documents.

However, at the time, the defendant received a loan by using false documents and did not intend to use it as the money for the money for the money for the entire lease even if he received a loan for the money for the money for the entire lease.

The defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to him.