All appeals filed by B and prosecutor are dismissed.

A. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, although the defendant A knew that the defendant B, who is his wife, made an investment in stocks with the money received from the victim, and could sufficiently be recognized that the crime of this case was committed in collusion with the above defendant B, the court below found the defendant A not guilty of the crime of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below to Defendant B (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor, the facts charged against the defendant A are the fraud of public offering with the defendant A and the ancillary facts charged against the defendant B. The defendant is the married couple around October 2005, and the defendant A served in financial rights, such as F.I.D. from around 1999 to March 206. The defendant B borrowed money from 4 credit card companies from around July 2007 to 100, 25 million won, 57 million won borrowed from pro-Japanese, 67 million won borrowed money from pro-Japanese, 90 million won borrowed money from 100, 209, 900 won borrowed money from 100,000 won to 200,000 won, and 90,000 won borrowed money from 10,000 won to 200,000 won, 90,000 won, and 200,000 won, 90,000 won.

Then, the Defendants are the defendants.