업무상배임
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
From July 5, 201 to July 5, 2014, the Defendant served as the representative director of the Victim B Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of real estate development, lease and sale, etc. In that process, the Defendant borrowed KRW 150 million from Dong C to January 7, 2013, and KRW 150 million from January 29, 201 to February 5, 2013, respectively.
1. On January 2013, the Defendant, at the victim company office located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”), committed an act of causing damage to the victim company by fulfilling the duty of due care as a good manager, but on April 30, 2007, the Defendant already transferred the documents related to provisional registration of the Ftel G of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the security of the said obligation, to the said C the documents related to the provisional registration of the maximum debt amount of 2.86 billion won, which was established as a collateral for the said obligation.
As a result, the defendant violated his duties, thereby having C gain pecuniary advantage equivalent to the above provisional registration and suffered loss equivalent to the same amount in the victim company.
2. On January 31, 2013, the Defendant transferred documents related to provisional registration of the site and J site in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which were owned by the victim company, for which the right to collateral security was established, to the said C the provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer on January 31, 2013, and the ownership transfer registration of which the owner as C was made on October 15, 2013, which was made on the security of the said right, to the victim company, and which was owned by the victim company, for which the right to collateral security was established, which caused damage to the victim company by fulfilling his/her duty of care as a good manager. < Amended by Act No. 11614, Jan. 16, 2013>
In this respect, the defendant is on duty.