beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.21 2017고단2718

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim C without any reason while drinking alcohol at the victim C’s house operated by the victim C from September 26, 2017 to September 23:15 of the same day from September 26, 2017.

Cr. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H

“Audition”, “Audition,” and “Audition to the victim,” and “Audition to the victim’s phone number of the finite and the finite number,” after putting the victim into the above finite house.

The term “satisfy” means a disturbance, such as voice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the duty of the damaged person's house business by force.

2. Disturbing the business of victims E;

A. On September 27, 2017, from around 00:20 to around 00:35 of the same day, the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as drinking alcohol at the convenience store where the victim E works in Jeju, and drinking alcohol on the display stand, making cans, beer, and beer in beer and beer in beer in beer and beer in beer, and making it difficult for the Defendant to avoid disturbance, such as sound and beer to the victim and customers.

B. As described in the above paragraph (a), the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s convenience store business operations; and (b) went out of the above convenience store upon receiving a request from the police officer who was called out after receiving a 112 report; and (c) on September 27, 2017, the Defendant found the above convenience store again on September 27, 2017, leaving the cans, bed and bed in the display stand, leaving the cans and beds in the display stand on the calculation unit; and (d) had failed to avoid disturbance, such as noise, etc. of the victim.

(c)

The defendant had interfered with the convenience store business of the victim as described in the above sub-paragraph (b) and had been demanded to return home from the police officer called out after receiving 112 reports.