The Defendant, between C and C, as the Defendant: (a) for a short period of time, by deceiving Smarket suppliers as if he would normally settle the payment of the paid-in land by leasing Smarket Cop, Ltd.; and (b) under the so-called “Weama”, which is lower than the market price by deceiving Smarket suppliers.

The Defendant’s role in disposing of the Defendant, as well as the Defendant’s supply of funds necessary for the commission of the crime, is partly so-called “Bada”

An invitation was made to share the roles to be disposed of to “.....”

around April 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) leased Smarket Coins and sold money to C for the purchase of refined meat to display at the store in question on the street prior to Smarket Coins, Sc., Ltd. at the end of Asan City; (b) “F” points inside the above E, around 17:00 on May 8, 2012, the Defendant: (c) sold the same appearance as selling refined meat normally by renting the above E Coins and keeping the refined meat; and (d) C received an order from the victims to pay the price in a normal manner without having the intent or ability to pay the price; and (c) C received an order from the victims to the 30 million won on May 9, 2012, including the supply of 17:00 and the supply of 5.25 billion won on July 25, 2015 to 2015: (d) supply of refined meat from the victims to the 36.5 billion won on the same day; (e) supply of 2, 29.25.25.1.205g.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, obtained property by deceiving victims as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Part C of the three-time prosecutorial examination protocol against the defendant

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations on police statements to G, H, I, J, and K

1. Article 347(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Code for the pertinent provision of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime (the crime shall be covered by each victim).