2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The Plaintiff, as a specialized constructor, consented to the general terms and conditions of the construction contract, such as the Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party through the electronic bidding procedure, established rules, public notice, etc., and entered the contract from the Defendant on December 7, 2010 with the amount of KRW 58,821,00 (including value-added tax) and the construction period from December 8, 2010 to December 31, 2010. At the time of the contract statement, the Plaintiff entered the contract statement as the contractor’s remuneration (the difference between the height and lower level) 168 square meters, 1,200 meters (the difference between the difference between the difference and the difference), 30 cm remuneration (the difference between the difference 1cm) and 40 m/ 40 m/ 40 m/ 40 m/ 40 m/ 140 m/ 40 m/ 40 m/ 40 m/ m/ m/ 45 m/ m/ m.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant changed the said construction period from January 31, 2011 to March 6, 2011, on the grounds that the said construction period was suspended during the wintering period, the incidental training, and the following: (a) again changed from March 6, 2011 to April 30, 201.

C. On March 26, 2011, the Plaintiff submitted a modified construction plan to construct approximately 400 m (i.e., 3,000 m in equal length) from the center of the runway to approximately 70 m (i.e., 70 m., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e. 18:0 on March 28, 201

On the other hand, the Plaintiff, in consultation with the Defendant, cannot be regarded as a shocker repair to fill the gap of the small wave repair work from April 19, 201 to April 20, 201, pursuant to the Public Law that reduces the specific part of the asphalt and then re-endorses it.