If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Defendant

A is an employee of the G Pharmacy in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B is a pharmacist who operates the above pharmacy.

No person other than a pharmacy founder may sell medicines.

1. On August 19, 201, Defendant A sold a comprehensive identification call, which is an over-the-counter medicine, to customers, at the above pharmacy around August 15:13, 201, even though Defendant A is not a pharmacy founder.

2. Defendant B sold drugs to Defendant A, an employee, even though he was not a pharmacy founder as set forth in paragraph (1) in connection with Defendant B’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. The statement of the witness H;

1. Application of the statute to the CD verification result of this Court

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 93 (1) 7 and Article 44 (1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act;

(b) Defendant B: Articles 97, 93(1)7, and 44(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;