A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering that the nature of the instant crime is not good, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is already divided in depth; (b) the Defendant has no criminal record of a stay of execution or more; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex and environment; (d) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant argument, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (e) the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too heavy or unreasonable; and (e) the Defendant and the Prosecutor

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.