The sentence of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Although the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case, considering the frequency of the crime of this case, the amount of philophones that the defendant bought, sold, received, or administered, the nature of the crime of this case is significant, the criminal committed during the repeated crime period of the same kind of crime, and the past has the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment several times for the same crime, and all other sentencing conditions including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, risk of recidivism, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.