However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From June 2009 to February 2, 2012, the Defendant, as a professor of the Korea University Social Welfare Department, was in charge of cooperation with the E-project team, FF business team, G project team, H project team, the head of the J project team, the head of the J project team, and the L Project Group affiliated with the Korea University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation.

1. M and the Defendant, as if they produced the website from “N” between M and M managing “N, intended to collect the cost of production on the website from the victim-based cooperation foundation of the D University, and obtain such cost by fraud.

The Defendant, around September 18, 2009, proposed that the E business team office located in the agency located in the agency located in the agency located in the agency located in the Jeon-nam-U.S., and had an employee P, as if he produced the website of the E business team from the “N”, demanded the victim’s expenditure officer to claim KRW 10,000,000 for cost of creating the website.

However, the “N” did not have produced the website of the E business entity.

As above, the Defendant deceivings a person in charge of expenditures of the victim and transferred KRW 10,000,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account of M or Q as a cost of manufacturing the same website on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the victim's property in collusion with M.

2. R and the Defendant gathered to obtain the difference by excessively claiming the cost of production and maintenance of the website of the E business entity, the FF business entity, the G business entity, the H business entity, and the J business entity at the D University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, which is the victim, between R and R that operates the LAS.

On June 24, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around June 24, 2010, at the E business team office located in the Seoul National University located in the Seoul National University, the Defendant had the employees P pay KRW 5,000,000 to the E business team website reorganization cost; and (b) had the victim’s expenditure officer claim the expenses.

However, in fact, the expenses for the reorganization of the website of the EPA were only 1,000,000 won.

The Defendant is the victim as above.