2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

A. Nonparty D’s right to claim the delivery of the gardenstone against the Defendant, who possesses the corporeal movables listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant garden”) was brought a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking the delivery, etc. of the instant gardenstone, and was sentenced to the judgment that “the Defendant shall deliver the instant garden to D,” and the said judgment was finalized on April 12, 2014.

(J) Changwon District Court 201Kahap8782, Busan High Court 2013Na6709). (B)

On January 4, 2017, the Plaintiff was issued a seizure order against D’s claim for the delivery of the instant garden (hereinafter “instant seizure order”) with the Changwon District Court 2017 other bond 4, which was executed by notary public E, which belongs to the original District Public Prosecutor’s Office, in relation to D’s right to request the delivery of the instant garden. The instant seizure order was served on January 9, 2017 to the Defendant, who is the garnishee.

Then, on June 15, 2017, the Plaintiff received a collection order (hereinafter “instant collection order”) against D’s claim for the delivery of the instant garden number on the basis of the said notarial deed from the Changwon District Court 2017TT4886, and the instant collection order was served on June 19, 2017 to the Defendant, the garnishee, who is the third obligor.

C. On November 1, 2017, the Plaintiff, based on the instant collection order, filed an application for the enforcement of the attachment of the instant stone with the competent court No. 2017No. 980, but on the enforcement date, the enforcement officer F affiliated with the instant court was prepared on the enforcement date, on the ground that the Defendant refused to execute the instant collection order, and the execution officer F, on the enforcement date, was located at 120 points, and the execution officer’s 100 points cannot be identified

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-7 evidence, significant facts in this court, purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination:

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant who occupies the instant garden, barring special circumstances, against D's defendant.