Seized evidence 1 to 5 shall be confiscated, respectively.

The defendant is a game products related business operator who operates a juvenile game room in the name of "E" from the 1st floor of Busan Jin-gu, Busan, and no one shall provide game products with contents different from those rated by the Rating Board for distribution or use.

From Jun. 2, 2012 to Jul. 13:00, the Defendant established 30 games in the “Matotoo-3” game room in the above game room and operated the business. The Defendant, which was deliberated upon by the Game Rating Board, was a game product to obtain free gifts with the user’s ability, and the game machine is classified as a prize and the winning portion regardless of the game user’s choice, and the game machine is not treated as a prize and the answer is selected in some sections, and the Defendant provided an unspecified number of customers with the revised and modified game products so that the user’s ability does not affect the game proceeding, by selecting the answer only in other sections, and by selecting the answer only within the other sections, the answer is not processed.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of L or I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (as to the attachment of an appraisal report on a game machine);

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;