When the defendant enters a normal game room as a person with no certain occupation and does not pay money to the game room users, the defendant was willing to raise money by threatening the police to report the operation of the illegal game room.

On December 2, 2010, the Defendant, in the “E” game room operated by the victim D with the second floor in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Sinnam-si, the Defendant, “E,” which was operated by the victim D, was “I will operate the illegal game room,” and the illegal game room is 120 military units. In such a sense, the Defendant would not engage in the illegal game room business. It is a job to return to the home game room. The Defendant would have been able to report to the police on the suspicion of operating the illegal game room without giving money.

As such, the Defendant: (a) received a total of KRW 1930,000 from the victims, who are the owners of game establishments, on a total of 40 occasions from December 2, 201 to March 19, 201, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, i.e., receipt of KRW 50,000 in cash from the victims who fright to frighten the victim; and (b) received KRW 1930,000 from the victims, who are the owners

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F, G, and H;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in the E-Game book attached to investigation report (report on attachment, such as a memorandum);

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;